Reading "penalizing certain lifestyles" reminded me of my friend Carla. Her water bill doubled after the utility installed smart meters that flagged her garden watering as excessive. She maintains a small vegetable patch to offset grocery costs, but the algorithm categorized her usage as non-essential. Now she faces higher rates for trying to be self-sufficient, which seems like the opposite of efficiency. It's discouraging to see data used this way.
Calling garden watering 'non-essential' shows a flawed algorithm. Data from smart meters should inform better resource management, not punish sustainable practices. For example, utilities could tier pricing based on overall household efficiency, not just raw usage. Carla's vegetable patch reduces food miles and packaging waste, which aligns with broader environmental goals. Penalizing that while ignoring wasteful indoor usage misses the point. The system needs to value outcomes, not just inputs.