Loading…
15
Update: I picked the human bookkeeper over the AI software, here's what happened
I run a small tax prep office in Tulsa and last month I had to decide between a $200/month AI bookkeeping tool or hiring a part time human for $18/hour. I went with the human because my clients are mostly retirees who bring in shoeboxes of receipts, and the AI demo couldn't handle handwritten notes at all. Three weeks in, the human caught a $1,400 deduction that the software would've missed because it flagged a duplicate utility bill as junk. Now I'm wondering if I'm just being stubborn about tech, or if there's a real line where automation stops being useful. Has anyone else hit that exact point where the cheaper option actually cost more in the long run?
1 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In1 Comment
gray87511d ago
...my buddy runs a landscaping company and he tried one of those AI scheduling tools last spring. It kept double booking his crews because it couldn't tell the difference between a client's note about rain delays and an actual new job request. He ended up paying two crews overtime for a day of no work, about $900 wasted. He fired the software and went back to his wife keeping the books on a spreadsheet, she caught three billing errors in the first week that more than covered her hours. So yeah, I think there's a real line and it's usually right where the messy human details start.
1