Capturing real human emotion is what makes street photography powerful, even when it's painful to see. Many famous photographers built careers on those raw, unasked moments because they tell truth. The line gets blurry, but deleting a photo like that feels like hiding what it means to be human. Do you believe some moments are too private even if they make a strong picture?
In my neighborhood last month, a local news crew filmed a man breaking down after his house fire. I get what @garcia.paige is saying about asking first. That man was in clear pain and deserved a moment to himself. Taking a photo without permission feels like stealing a piece of someone's grief. But I also understand that hard images can make people care about important issues. Where should photographers draw the line when the story feels bigger than one person's pain?
How can we claim to document real life if we only snap happy moments? Street photos that skip the hard stuff feel FAKE to me. Look at all the iconic pictures from history, like people crying after a disaster. Those images told stories that NEEDED to be seen. If we always ask first, we lose the raw truth. Grief is part of being human, and hiding it just makes our view of the world smaller.