Hot take: I actually looked up the moon landing 'evidence' myself

I mean, I always thought the flag waving thing was weird, so I finally watched the NASA footage from 1969 frame by frame. The 'wave' is just from the astronaut twisting the pole to plant it, which makes total sense when you see it in motion. Has anyone else actually checked the primary source on a theory they doubted?

3 comments

3 Comments

pat_rivera25d ago

You know what's funny? I had the same moment with those old photos of the "face on Mars." Spent an hour looking at the raw NASA image files online, zooming in on that one hill. From the right angle in one picture, sure, it kinda looks like a face. But in all the other pictures from different orbits and lighting, it's just a regular, bumpy rock. Makes you wonder why we want to see patterns that aren't there, right?

gavin22825d ago

Totally get that. I did the same thing with those "ghost" photos people post online. Downloaded the original, cranked up the brightness and contrast in a free editor, and it was always just a weird smudge on the lens or a streetlight in the distance. Our brains are just wired to fill in the blanks, even when there's nothing to see.

wade25024d ago

Honestly, the best fix for that is to just look at more pictures. One weird angle can trick you, but a dozen boring shots from different times of day kill the magic fast. Our brains are really good at making a story from a single piece of info. It's why those "bigfoot" photos never hold up under real looking. You have to drown the pattern in normal, boring data.